A newly launched platform called InfiniteInk is emerging as a compromise for NFT creators on Tezos who want greater control over their work without taking on the technical complexity of smart contract deployment. The platform is designed for artists seeking ownership of their own contracts while still benefiting from the visibility and liquidity of established NFT marketplaces.
InfiniteInk has been positioned as an alternative to shared contract minting environments by allowing artists to mint NFTs directly from their wallets into contracts they control. At the same time, the NFTs remain discoverable on widely used secondary marketplaces such as Objkt, ensuring that creators do not sacrifice audience reach in exchange for autonomy. The platform emphasizes accessibility by removing the need for coding knowledge or manual contract configuration.
Contract Ownership Without Technical Barriers
The platform supports a broad range of NFT formats commonly used by digital artists, including one-of-one works, limited editions, open editions, and auction-based releases. It also allows artists to create allowlists, enabling tiered drops and controlled access for specific collector groups. While these features are standard across many NFT platforms, InfiniteInk differentiates itself by ensuring that creators deploy NFTs through contracts they own rather than through shared infrastructure.
This structural distinction is particularly relevant for artists who intend to build extensive or long-term bodies of work. Shared contract platforms such as TEIA and Objkt have historically played an important role in onboarding creators into the Web3 ecosystem due to their ease of use and community-driven design. However, as artists scale their output, concerns often arise around portability, governance, and long-term control. Assets minted through shared contracts can become more difficult to manage if a platform changes its policies or ceases operations.
Balancing Autonomy and Practicality
InfiniteInk seeks to address these concerns by offering creator-owned contracts while maintaining compatibility with existing marketplace infrastructure. The platform relies on IPFS for content storage, a choice that balances flexibility and decentralization with ease of use. While this approach does not meet the standards of full on-chain permanence favoured by some creators, it provides a level of independence that exceeds that of most shared contract alternatives.
Fully on-chain NFT platforms such as Zerounbound and Bootloader are often cited by artists who prioritize maximal permanence. InfiniteInk does not directly compete in that category, instead positioning itself as a practical middle layer for creators who value ownership and flexibility but are not prepared to manage the technical demands of fully on-chain systems.
Community Visibility and Discovery Tools
Beyond contract mechanics, InfiniteInk introduces a platform-wide activity feed that displays minting and sales activity across its ecosystem. While this feature may appear incremental, it addresses a common limitation within the Tezos NFT landscape, where aggregator-based marketplaces tend to present all activity in a flattened format. By offering a dedicated feed, InfiniteInk fosters a stronger sense of platform-specific community and allows artists and collectors to observe trends, releases, and engagement in real time.
This visibility component is intended to strengthen artist discovery and encourage interaction among creators and collectors who are aligned with the platform’s philosophy. It also reinforces InfiniteInk’s role as more than a technical tool, positioning it as a social and cultural layer within the broader Tezos NFT ecosystem.
Positioning Within the Tezos NFT Landscape
InfiniteInk enters the market at a time when Tezos-based artists are increasingly evaluating trade-offs between convenience and control. By combining wallet-based minting, creator-owned contracts, and continued marketplace exposure, the platform aims to serve artists who have outgrown shared contract environments but are not ready to move fully on-chain. Its design reflects a growing demand for infrastructure that supports artistic independence without introducing prohibitive technical complexity.
